Writer in Residence – The Thirteenth Apostle (and his mum) by Paul Andruss

Today part one of the story of The Thirteenth Apostle (and his mum) from Paul Andruss.  As with any legend, there is usually some variations on the origins and plenty of embellishments by later historians, that need to be resolved. Paul takes on the task and unravels the stories to reveal the probable truth behind Constantine the Great, the first Christian Emperor.. and his mother Helena.

The Thirteenth Apostle (and his mum) by Paul Andruss

Statue of Constantine the Great at York (source: schoolworkhelper)

This is about an illegitimate boy, who grew up to inherit a shattered empire and changed the world; who overthrew pantheons of gods for the one his old mum worshipped.

Although he was not baptised until on his deathbed, he claimed to be Christ’s most favoured disciple. At one time he was believed to be a British king who became emperor of the Romans; and his mum, Helena, a British Princess who found the true cross of Jesus and became a saint, which ain’t too shabby for a barmaid.

Constantine the Great, the first Christian Emperor, was once considered British born and bred. The legend went something like this. His dad, Constantius, was a Roman senator who came to Britain to meet old King Cole in Colchester. Yes, that old King Cole, although he wasn’t such a merry old soul when he thought the Romans were coming to knock him off his throne. When Cole died, Constantius took the throne for himself and married Cole’s daughter, the beautiful Princess Helena. In due course their son Constantine became king and sometime later took his army off to the continent to thrash the perfidious Romans and ended up becoming Emperor.

Head of the Colossus of Constantine in the Courtyard of the Palazzo dei Conservatori of the Musei Capitolini, (source: jacabook.it)

As with all legends, there are nuggets of truth mixed with fool’s gold. There probably was an Old King Cole (in legend called Coel Hen meaning Old Cole), but nothing is known of him except he wasn’t king of Colchester, which is named from the Roman words for ‘colony’ and ‘fort’. He probably was a warlord working for the Romans beyond Hadrian’s Wall, around 350 AD: a quarter of a century after Constantine died.

Part of Constantine’s legend is mixed up with another Roman General who left Britain to become Emperor almost a century later. Magnus Maximus, which modestly translates as Greatest of the Great, was married a British Princess called St Helena of Wales, and they had a son named Custennin (Welsh for Constantine).

Constantius Chlorus (Source: Alchetron)

Our Constantine’s dad was Constantius Chlorus, meaning pale or literally green. He may have been suffering from chlorosis: a pernicious anaemia, or even leukaemia. He was a member of the emperor’s bodyguard who worked his way up to Caesar. At this time the Empire was divided between four rulers: the Eastern and Western senior emperors called Augusti and their juniors named Caesars. Constantius came to stop the Scottish Picts raiding the Roman province of Britain.

Constantine’s mum was not a princess. She was an inn keeper’s daughter from the Black Sea and probably his common-law wife as the army did not approve of soldiers marrying.

By the time Constantius became Caesar he had dumped her for a political marriage to his Augustus’ daughter.

Constantius recognised Constantine as his son and heir meaning the lad grew up as a hostage to his father’s loyalty in the Emperor Diocletian’s court, where he became a favourite due to his military prowess. When Diocletian abdicated in May 305, rather than take his chances in the bloodbath that invariably accompanied a new Emperor’s reign, Constantine fled to his dad in Britain.

When his father died at York six months later, the soldiers elected the 32 year old Constantine to the rank of Caesar. While this was by no means unusual, you still had to fight for it. Constantine spent the next 20 years killing off his rivals to emerge as sole emperor.

His first major battle, and miracle, was at Milvian Bridge outside Rome, in 313 AD, against his rival Western Emperor. Details are sketchy. The story goes he had a dream before the battle advising him to make his soldiers paint their shields with the Chi Rho (two Greek letters X=CH & P=R) used as an acrostic for Christ. Later, this became a vision of a cross in the sun with the words ‘by this conquer’ witnessed by Constantine and his army. That story first appears in his biography written by Bishop Eusebius long after Constantine’s death.

The Chi- Ro Source: (clker .com)

The story is a good example of the propaganda obscuring Constantine’s reign. As the first Christian Emperor instead of history we have hagiography (holy-writing), usually reserved for the miraculous lives of saints. In part, this might be due to Constantine’s own influence.

Eusebius also states a year later Constantine issued the Edict of Milan, recognising Christianity as a legal religion. This is another gloss. The edict did not promote Christianity but merely affirmed the previous Edict of Toleration ending Diocletian’s Christian Persecution. It had been rescinded by the Eastern Augustus, enemy of Constantine and his Augustus Licinius. Although Constantine may have been responsible, the edict was issued in Licinius’ name. Yet when Eusebius wrote Constantine’s biography, Licinius’ was demonised.

After their victory, Licinius made Constantine the Western Augustus; taking for himself the more prosperous East. Constantine carried on the civil war. In 323, at the age of 50 he emerged as sole ruler after his sister had persuaded her husband Licinius to surrender in return for his life. Two months later Constantine had him murdered: no one knows why.

During his struggle for ultimate power, Constantine was careful to avoid any mention of Christ. Instead he used Sol Invictus – the Unconquered Sun (whose holy day was Sunday) – as the symbol of the supreme god. Yet while he was careful not to upset the Senate or citizens of largely pagan Rome, he refused to attend a victory sacrifice to Jupiter and spent a lot of his own money restoring Rome’s damaged churches.

Once Constantine was sole emperor he issued a proclamation, in the name of Christ, saying all citizens regardless of religious belief, should be able to enjoy a life of peace and concord. Despite this he had no compunction consulting pagan oracles or displaying himself as Sol Invictus when it suited.

It is often said Christianity’s appeal for Constantine was its unity and organisation. Different peoples united in belief are easier to control than those divided by a plethora of gods. Christians were obedient to the elders and priests, who were in turn subject to an Overseer (the original meaning of Bishop). Christians also willingly paid church taxes.

Paganism was certainly nowhere near as organised, as evidenced some 50 years later when the emperor Julian the Apostate was ridiculed and possibly assassinated for trying to reintroduce the old gods. Yet the words vicar and diocese originally came from pagan Roman politics. (Pagan is a Christian word meaning a sort of country bumpkin.)

After almost a century of civil war Constantine’s main priority was an empire united by one church and one god, under one emperor. Yet he found Christianity riven by schism. The latest dispute concerned whether Christ had the same or a similar nature to God.

Constantine wrote to the bishops concerned asking them to bury their trivial differences for the sake of the empire.

When he was ignored, he summoned all the bishops to a Synod at Nicene to thrash out their differences. Constantine flattered them, pandered to their arrogance and in the end threatened them into agreeing a common creed. Although he thought he succeeded, Christians have continued to be at each other’s throats ever since. A millennium later Roman and Greek Orthodoxy split. Soon afterwards Protestant dissidents split from Catholicism.

In 326 Constantine had his wife and eldest son executed amid rumours they had an affair. Constantine was jealous of his son’s popularity with the army and people, and may have feared for his life. Constantine’s wife, and mother of his 5 children, was killed a few weeks later in bathhouse sauna. It is unknown if she was stabbed or locked in to be suffocated by the steam and broiled alive.

One of Constantine’s first acts as Emperor was to send for his mother. He renamed her birthplace Helenopolis and awarded her the title of Augusta Imperatrix instead of his wife. It was no empty title. An Augusta could issue her own coinage, wear imperial regalia, and rule her own courts. No wonder his wife was furious; perhaps this is what prompted her, possibly real, and certainly alleged affair with his son. Finally he gave his mother unlimited access to the imperial treasury to locate holy relics.

At the age of 72 Helena enthusiastically set off to Jerusalem where, according to legend she discovered the crosses of Jesus and the two thieves and was able to distinguish the true cross when a dying woman recovered after touching it. Strangely, the normally sycophantic Bishop Eusebius fails to mention this.

Helena sent the true cross, along with some thorns from the crown of thorns, and nails from the crucifixion to aid her son; who allegedly placed one nail in his helmet and another in his horse’s bridle. She took full advantage of the imperial treasury by endowing churches at Bethlehem, in the Sinai Desert at the place of the burning bush, and the Holy Sepulchre after having the area levelled and cleared.

It is not certain what happened to Helena, some historians report she brought the treasures back in person. Others, by their silence, indicate she died in the Holy Land on pilgrimage. I rather hope it was the latter and she died enjoying thoroughly herself. Helena was declared a saint.

The Relics of St Helena were on loan in Athens from the Vatican in 2017 (Source : http://www.keeptalkinggreece.com)

Part Two next Friday.. same time.

©Paul Andruss 2017

About Paul Andruss

Paul Andruss is a writer whose primary focus is to take a subject, research every element thoroughly and then bring the pieces back together in a unique and thought provoking way. His desire to understand the origins of man, history, religion, politics and the minds of legends who rocked the world is inspiring. He does not hesitate to question, refute or make you rethink your own belief system and his work is always interesting and entertaining. Whilst is reluctant to talk about his own achievements he offers a warm and generous support and friendship to those he comes into contact with.

Paul is a modest but very talented author and he has two books currently available. Thomas the Rhymer – a magical fantasy for ages 11 to adult about a boy attempting to save fairy Thomas the Rhymer, while trying to rescue his brother from a selfish fairy queen.

I have read and reviewed Thomas the Rhymer earlier in the year, and here is the link to download the epub version of the books for FREE.

Thomas the Rhymer Paul Andruss

Paul also has a pdf file available and you can read for FREE by obtaining a copy from Barnes & Noble for Nook readers and also from Kobo.

You can find out how to download from Paul’s site and also links to the other options at this link. http://www.jackhughesbooks.com/amazon-links.php

It would be amazing if you do download and enjoy the book as much as I did. If so then it would be great if you could put a review on Amazon by adding in a sentence at the beginning – Disclaimer: I was gifted with a copy of this book from the author..  Or you can leave a review on Facebook and tag Paul in the post by using his full name Paul George Boylan.

Finn Mac Cool

Paul’s second books is Finn Mac Cool – rude, crude and funny, explicitly sexual and disturbingly violent, Finn Mac Cool is strictly for adults only.

Connect to Paul on social media.

Blog: http://www.paul-andruss.com/
Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/paul.andruss.9
Twitter: https://twitter.com/Paul_JHBooks
Google+  https://plus.google.com/s/+jackhughesbooks

You can find all of Paul’s posts in this directory: https://smorgasbordinvitation.wordpress.com/writer-in-residence-writer-paul-andruss/

Thank you for dropping by today and please feel free to share the post on your own blog and networks. Thanks Sally

62 thoughts on “Writer in Residence – The Thirteenth Apostle (and his mum) by Paul Andruss

    • Bob you are so right especially when one of the spin doctors was the newly recognised christian church who owed everything to Constantine and were going to make sure their hero did not suffer any bad publicity.
      There is a document in the Vatican called the Donation of Constantine in which Constantine hands over a large part of Italy (what were the Papal States) to the Pope in perpetuity. It is actually a medieval forgery that the church used to keep laying claim to territories of the Holy Roman Emperor. Honestly you can’t trust anyone can you!!!

      Liked by 3 people

    • Firstly Lesley thank you,that is a lovely thing to say. I think you are spot on with the pagan thing. Pagans were worshippers of the earth especially the cycles of birth and fertility.
      Fred Nietzsche splits this up rather nicely with his Apollonian vs Dionysian religions. Dionysus as you know was the god of wine who worship was a bit rowdy, while Apollo came to represent high culture and was naturally more po-faced.
      As you know early religions used a lot of real and symbolic sexuality in worship for example temple prostitutes (giving us the word fornication- literally the arch of the temple under which the priestesses plied their trade) as a way of both communing with the eternal spirit… the transcendental orgasm… and as sympathetic magic for the renewal of life.
      By the return to Jerusalem under Cyrus the Great Judaism had re-defined itself as a way of keeping its cultural identity in exile and distancing itself from the uncomfortable parallels with Babylonian religious rites.
      The successful branch of Christianity, maybe through the influence of Essenes, inherited a distaste for the physical expression of worship. Although not all branches of early Christianity felt the same if you read the criticisms of rival factions by early church fathers.
      Also Chistianity, as it developed, was essentially an urban religion removed from the necessary cycles of birth and harvest. More familiar with the unremitting brutality and squalor of the ancient cities it fixated on sin and redemption through casting off earthly and fleshy demands.
      And Gordon Bennet that is whole other post there! Sorry about that!

      Liked by 3 people

  1. My mind boggles, Paul. So much blood and gore to absorb and think about. How long did it take to sift through and put this all together?

    Had to chuckle in a couple of places – love the humor you always inject.
    “…ain’t too shabby for a barmaid.” (I’m surprised feminists everywhere haven’t adopted Constantine the Great as an early proponent for honoring his mum!)

    “Although he thought he succeeded, Christians have continued to be at each other’s throats ever since.” (ahem – no comment necessary!)

    Love these, Sally – always glad to find another by Paul on your blog.
    (Madelyn Griffith-Haynie – ADDandSoMuchMORE dot com)
    ADD/EFD Coach Training Field founder; ADD Coaching co-founder
    “It takes a village to educate a world!”

    Liked by 3 people

  2. Paul, your posts are always amazing. That is down to the effort you put into them in terms of research, in all directions. The man, not the myth in this instance. Recognised the statue instantly from a fav place of mine. Glad I never missed this post. (Had a day off yesterday for me birthday. ) xx

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Pingback: Writer in Residence – The Thirteenth Apostle (and his mum) by Paul Andruss — Smorgasbord – Variety is the spice of life – Smriti Freelancer

  4. Pingback: Writer in Residence – The Thirteenth Apostle (and his mum) by Paul Andruss | Sue Vincent's Daily Echo

  5. Paul, I was still in bloody Russia when I started reading this, and had a heck of a time shifting gears ~ until I got to the part where Constantine had his wife and eldest son executed 🙂 I’m amazed by the amount of research involved in your brilliant posts. If only I were as disciplined ♥

    Liked by 3 people

    • Tina thank you that is a lovely comment. In truth we all work to our strengths. I admire the deep spiritual dimension to you work and life view and the certainty you carry in your core. My work comes from the incessant need to analyze and dissect until it makes sense to me. It probably will not come as a surprise to you that I was done in the year of the Monkey… we pick and pick and pick at the irritating ticks! Maybe in the next incarnation I will be more peaceful!

      Liked by 1 person

      • Welcome, Paul, and thank you. Did you know that Monkey people are the geniuses and charmers of the Chinese Zodiac? What you call nitpicking is a deep desire for knowledge, which you seek with great enthusiasm. You are original, flexible, talented, and the life of the party. As you can see, my perception of you is quite different from yours. But I guess that’s true for most. The face we see in the mirror would be a stranger to those who know us ♥

        Liked by 1 person

  6. Pingback: Smorgasbord Round Weekly Round Up – Constantine, Aubergines and Glass Blowing. | Smorgasbord – Variety is the spice of life

  7. I was aware of some of this, but it’s indeed hard-work to try and extract the possible truth from so many versions of the story. It’s not surprising when we think about the amount of time it has passed and fake news even now. Great work, Paul. Thanks, Sally!t

    Liked by 2 people

    • Thank Olga, there is so much information missing that some of this involves judgement. One of the surprising things is that over Constantine and Christianity despite there being contemporary evidence (one can quite easily draw conclusions from – believe me I am no expert), I have been shocked to find reputable historians fudge over the Milvian Bridge incident and other incidents and make claims that are not wholly supported.
      I am the first to admit I am not a historian. These posts are info-tainment. I try to keep it pretty accurate but a historian could pick me apart for sliding incidents together and not spending time explaining what happened between. (that is not the point of these.)
      However for historians to do that in books and articles specifically about Constantine does make me wonder if there is really any true objectivity in history at all? P


  8. Pingback: Writer in Residence – The Thirteenth Apostle (and his mum) Part Two by Paul Andruss | Smorgasbord – Variety is the spice of life

I would be delighted to receive your feedback (by commenting, you agree to Wordpress collecting your name, email address and URL) Thanks Sally

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.